𐰋𐰃𐰼𐰘𐰀 [beriyä]

Language	Cognate
Turkmen	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Turkish (Azerbaijan)	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Turkish (Türkiye)	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Salar	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Gagauz	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Crimean	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Uyghur	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Uzbek	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Kazakh	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Nogai	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Siberian Tatar	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Kyrgyz	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Altai	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Alan	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Kumyk	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Tatar	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Bashkir	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Tıva	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Khakas	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Sakha (Yakut, Dolgan)	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Khalaj	The cognate has disappeared from this language.
Chuvash	The cognate has disappeared from this language.

Dr. Jens Wilkens (2021) Handwörterbuch des Altuigurischen | Eski Uygurcanın El Sözlüğü

p. 161

Marcel Erdal (2004) A Grammar of Old Turkic

p. 179p. 56

p. 179

Directive-locative +rA was dissimilated to +yA when the stem had an /r/: beriyä ‘in/to the south’, yïrya ‘in/to the north’, kurïya ‘in/to the west’ < *berira, *yïrra, *kurïra; cf. e.g. Orkhon-Turkic kurïgaru, berigärü of the Uygur Steppe Empire Taryat inscription (W5). üzä ‘above’ might also have been formed in this way, as one source of Old Turkic /z/ is Proto-Turkic *ry; its base could have survived in Chuvash vir ‘upper’.³⁰⁹ The variant +yA cannot be connected with the dative suffix, as was thought by some,³¹⁰ both because of the different meanings of the forms and because +kA often appears in the same phonotactic surroundings as +yA. All the instances of +yA are, like directive-locative +rA, petrified and lexicalised. Most importantly, the meanings and functions of +yA and the directive-locative fit together perfectly.
³⁰⁹ All directive-locative items turn out to appear in opposite pairs and üzä would be the counterpart of asra. Another cognate is üstin, discussed in this section.
³¹⁰ E.g. Tekin 2003: 78. That +yA may have been a secondary form of +rA was assumed already in the EDPT (p. XL) and is argued against by T. Tekin 1996a: 330-31.

p. 56

bïrgarudun sïŋar ‘in the direction towards the south’ in M III nr. 4, 10,141 (ms. U 47 in Uygur writing; double-dotted X) shows that the numerous forms of birdin, birgärü and biryä in Orkhon Turkic and other Manichæan sources must all be secondary.⁹²
⁹² Clauson (EDPT 361) assumes that the instance is an error; this would have been likely if the ms. had been in Manichæan writing, where G and Г have rather similar shapes. As it is, we cannot simply ‘emend’ it away.

Sergei Starostin, Anna Dybo, Oleg Mudrak (2003) Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages

pp. 328–329

*bāri right, straight, direct: Tung. *bāru; Mong. *baraɣun; Turk. *bEr-; Jpn. *pìtà; Kor. *pàrằ-.
PTung. *bāru in the direction of (postpos.) (по направлению к (послелог)): Man. baru; Ul. bā- / bē-; Ork. bārụ-; Nan. bāro-; Orch. bai-ti.
◊ See ТМС 1, 75.
PMong. *baraɣun righthand side; West (правая сторона; запад): MMong. bara’un (HY 50, SH), barān (IM), bărawun (MA); WMong. baraɣun (L 84); Kh. barūn; Bur. barūn; Kalm. barūn; Ord. barūn; Mog. ZM baranɣǝl (7-1a); Dag. baran (Тод. Даг. 124), baren (MD 119); Dong. borun; S.-Yugh. barūn; Mongr. baroŋ, waroŋ (SM 22, 482) (MGCD waraŋ).
◊ KW 35, MGCD 145. MMong. baranqar > Chag. buranɣar ‘right wing (of an army)’, see Щербак 1997, 200. Mong. > Evk. baron, see Doerfer MT 126, Rozycki 25.
PTurk. *bEr- 1 southern, right 2 to the South, to the right (1 южный, правый 2 к югу, направо): OTurk. ber-din 1 (Orkh., OUygh.), beri-je 2, ber-gärü 2 (Orkh.).
◊ EDT 359,364, 370. The forms ber-din (abl.), ber-ije (adv.), ber-gerü (dir.) - from a spatial noun *ber. The usually related berü ‘this side, here’ etc. (EDT 355, ЭСТЯ II 124-125) should be rather kept apart. It is unclear morphologically (bērü < ber-rü seems to be a unique development) and may be derived from the demonstrative bu ‘this’, just like naru, aŋaru, onaru ‘that side, there’ is derived from the demonstrative stem an- ‘that’ (see Brockelmann 1954, 134).
PJpn. *pìtà direct, straight (прямой): OJpn. pjita; MJpn. fìtà; Tok. hita-to ‘directly, closely’.
◊ JLTT 409.
PKor. *pàrằ- direct, straight; right (прямой; правильный): MKor. pàrằ-; Mod. parɨ-.
◊ Nam 238, KED 706.
‖ EAS 57, SKE 191, Poppe 21. “Verbal” low tone in Korean. Doerfer (TMN 1, 207) attempts to dismantle Ramstedt’s comparison (Tung.-Kor.-Mong.) by preferring Ramstedt’s own earlier (KW 35) derivation of Mong. baraɣun ‘right; West’ < bara- ‘to end’ - which is evidently much weaker semantically.