đ°€đ° đ°
nĂ€lĂŒk
nĂ€lĂŒk is an interrogative adverb meaning âwhy?, for what reason?, for what purpose?â.
KÄĆĄgarÄ« states that nĂ€Ă§ĂŒk âwhy?â was characteristic of the YabÄqu dialect, whereas the other Turks used nĂ€lĂŒk.
The derivation of the word has been explained in different ways:
- ClausonâErdal (probable; preferred): nĂ€ + +aguÂČ â nĂ€gĂŒ, followed by +lık⎠â nĂ€gĂŒlĂŒk. Reduction produced nĂ€glĂŒk, from which the common nĂ€lĂŒk arose by further contraction. Clauson likewise regards nĂ€lĂŒk as a crasis of nĂ€gĂŒlĂŒk.
- Barutçu (possible; disputed): the word is instead derived from nĂ€ by means of an adverb-forming +lıâŽ, giving reconstructed *nĂ€li âhowâ, followed by the emphatic particle ök: *nĂ€li ök â nĂ€lĂŒk.
- A direct analysis as nĂ€ + +lık⎠is improbable. Since nĂ€ has an unrounded front vowel, the harmonic suffix would be expected in its unrounded form +lik, not +lĂŒk. Such an analysis therefore leaves the rounded ĂŒ unexplained, as Clauson already noted, whereas the independently attested synonymous nĂ€gĂŒlĂŒk and the reduced form nĂ€glĂŒk provide a concrete historical path to nĂ€lĂŒk.
Modern continuations survive in lexicalized ablative forms: Kazakh nelikten, Kyrgyz nelikten and Karakalpak nelikten âwhy, for what reasonâ, Tatar nilektĂ€n and Bashkir nilektĂ€n.
Examples
Translations
Bibliography 3
-
Dr. Jens Wilkens (2021) Handwörterbuch des Altuigurischen | Eski Uygurcanın El SözlĂŒÄĂŒ489489
nĂ€lĂŒk warum?, weshalb? || neden?, niçin? -
Marcel Erdal (2004) A Grammar of Old Turkic211211
The plural of nĂ€ appears to have been nĂ€gĂŒ, formed with the collective suffix +(A)gU; see OTWF 95. There are more instances in IrqB XXIV, U IV A42, Ht VII 1995 and Suv 610,11 and 621,4; e.g. takĂŻ nĂ€gĂŒ kĂŒtĂ€r sizlĂ€r (U I 43,7) âWhat else are you waiting for?â. nĂ€ nĂ€gĂŒ iĆĄ (U III 54,13) is âany sort of businessâ. nĂ€gĂŒ inflects for case as, e.g., nĂ€gĂŒdĂ€ ötgĂŒrĂŒ (U II 5,14) âthrough what thingsâ. nĂ€g(ĂŒ)lĂŒk âwhat for; to what purpose; whyâ is a derivate from nĂ€gĂŒ, attested e.g. in U IV A26, Suv 612,8, KP 4,9, 30,1 and 66,6 and often elsewhere. nĂ€gĂŒk (twice Suv) apparently comes from nĂ€gĂŒ (ö)k with the emphatic particle.
-
Gerard Clauson (1972) An etimological dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish777777
(S)D nelĂŒk âwhy?â; exactly syn. w. negĂŒlĂŒk and almost certainly a crasis of it, since there is no other reasonable explanation of the -ĂŒ-, cf. nĂŒ: < negĂŒ:. Survives in nelikten âwhy?â in NC Kir., Kzx.: NW Kk. TĂŒrkĂŒ viii ff. IrkB 57 (kanıÄ): UyÄ. Man.-A nelĂŒk keltiĆ biziĆe âwhy have you come to us?â M I 33, 20: Xak. xi nelĂŒk a Particle (harf) syn. w. neĂ§ĂŒk (q.v.) and used by the other Turks instead of it; it means li-ma âwhy?â KaĆ. I 392; five o.o., mostly ne:lĂŒk, but in I 94, 2 mis-spelt ne: elĂŒk: KB nelĂŒk âwhy?â is fairly common 241, 369, 775, 3984 (negĂŒlĂŒk), 6440-1, etc.: xiii(?) At. nelĂŒk âwhy?â (occurs four times); Tef. ditto 228: xiv Muh. li-ma ne:li:k/nelĂŒk/ne:re:k/ne:k Mel. 17, 17; Rif. 96 (with kam for li-ma): Xwar. xiii nelĂŒk âwhy?â âAli 17: xiv ditto Qutb 113; MN 255: Kıp. xiv nelĂŒk li-ma in Kıp. (i.e. as opposed to Tkm. nĂ©Će:) İd. 90; li-ayy Ćayâ âwhy?â nelĂŒk Bul. 15, 11: xv another Interrogative is nelik meaning li-ma Tuh. 57b. 7 (quotn.).